<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 328 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756624</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the revocation of a customs broker license and penalty imposed in connection with import of 1792 MT of Black Pepper into KASEZ. The appellant was denied the right to cross-examine witnesses whose statements formed the basis of departmental action, violating principles of natural justice under Regulation 17(4) of CBLR 2018. The tribunal held that customs brokers and their employees are separate legal entities, and brokers cannot be held responsible for employee acts without proper appointment authorization. The department failed to follow prescribed procedures for license revocation, rendering the order legally unsustainable. Appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:43:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 328 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756624</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the revocation of a customs broker license and penalty imposed in connection with import of 1792 MT of Black Pepper into KASEZ. The appellant was denied the right to cross-examine witnesses whose statements formed the basis of departmental action, violating principles of natural justice under Regulation 17(4) of CBLR 2018. The tribunal held that customs brokers and their employees are separate legal entities, and brokers cannot be held responsible for employee acts without proper appointment authorization. The department failed to follow prescribed procedures for license revocation, rendering the order legally unsustainable. Appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>