<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 327 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756623</link>
    <description>Classification of imported goods turned on whether the prescribed ASTM D86 method was properly used to determine naphtha under Heading 2710 11 19. The record showed that laboratory reports and lab records did not establish compliance with the mandated test, while the department relied mainly on oral assertions and an incomplete cross-examination. A quality certificate from the port of loading referred to ASTM D86 testing, but the adverse report did not disclose the procedure adopted. On that material, the finding rejecting naphtha classification and the related denial of exemption could not be sustained, and the duty, fine and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 327 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756623</link>
      <description>Classification of imported goods turned on whether the prescribed ASTM D86 method was properly used to determine naphtha under Heading 2710 11 19. The record showed that laboratory reports and lab records did not establish compliance with the mandated test, while the department relied mainly on oral assertions and an incomplete cross-examination. A quality certificate from the port of loading referred to ASTM D86 testing, but the adverse report did not disclose the procedure adopted. On that material, the finding rejecting naphtha classification and the related denial of exemption could not be sustained, and the duty, fine and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>