https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756620 The Court examined whether arrest and remand in a CBI matter were unlawful for alleged non-compliance with Sections 41 and 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and whether malice in law vitiated the arrest. It noted that the petitioner had been examined under Section 160, later interrogated in jail after court permission, and then sought to be arrested on the basis of investigation material, witness and approver statements, and evasive replies. As the recorded reasons showed a need for custodial interrogation and confrontation with evidence, the Court found the arrest was not arbitrary and disclosed no illegality or lack of justification. The arrest and remand were therefore held lawful. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2024 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756620 The Court examined whether arrest and remand in a CBI matter were unlawful for alleged non-compliance with Sections 41 and 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and whether malice in law vitiated the arrest. It noted that the petitioner had been examined under Section 160, later interrogated in jail after court permission, and then sought to be arrested on the basis of investigation material, witness and approver statements, and evasive replies. As the recorded reasons showed a need for custodial interrogation and confrontation with evidence, the Court found the arrest was not arbitrary and disclosed no illegality or lack of justification. The arrest and remand were therefore held lawful. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756620