<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1645 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456626</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that payments to a German individual for professional services were not taxable in India under Article 14 of the India-Germany DTAA, as no permanent establishment existed and services were rendered outside India. No TDS liability arose under section 195(1), making section 40(a)(ia) inapplicable. However, payments to a UK entity for designing services constituted technical services under the India-UK DTAA, confirming the disallowance. Regarding interest disallowance on interest-free advances, the tribunal found the assessee had adequate non-interest bearing funds and established commercial expediency, ruling no nexus existed between borrowed funds and the advance, thereby deleting the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 20:13:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1645 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456626</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that payments to a German individual for professional services were not taxable in India under Article 14 of the India-Germany DTAA, as no permanent establishment existed and services were rendered outside India. No TDS liability arose under section 195(1), making section 40(a)(ia) inapplicable. However, payments to a UK entity for designing services constituted technical services under the India-UK DTAA, confirming the disallowance. Regarding interest disallowance on interest-free advances, the tribunal found the assessee had adequate non-interest bearing funds and established commercial expediency, ruling no nexus existed between borrowed funds and the advance, thereby deleting the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>