<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1455 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456637</link>
    <description>Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 was read as a land-identification provision for public streets and related amenities, not as a standalone source of compulsory acquisition power; the acquisition power instead lies in the Act&#039;s separate acquisition chapter, including Section 537. Article 300A requires more than compensation for lawful deprivation of property: notice, opportunity to object, reasoned decision, public purpose, fair compensation, and an effective acquisition process. Section 363 was treated only as a compensation clause linked to acquisition by agreement, so it could not cure the absence of compulsory-acquisition safeguards or validate acquisition under Section 352.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1455 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456637</link>
      <description>Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 was read as a land-identification provision for public streets and related amenities, not as a standalone source of compulsory acquisition power; the acquisition power instead lies in the Act&#039;s separate acquisition chapter, including Section 537. Article 300A requires more than compensation for lawful deprivation of property: notice, opportunity to object, reasoned decision, public purpose, fair compensation, and an effective acquisition process. Section 363 was treated only as a compensation clause linked to acquisition by agreement, so it could not cure the absence of compulsory-acquisition safeguards or validate acquisition under Section 352.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>