https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456625 Land acquired under Section 25A of the Santhal Pargana Rent Regulation Act, 1886 was treated as transferable basauri land, and the 1949 Santhal Parganas tenancy provisions and Section 44A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 did not bar its transfer because the later law was prospective and inapplicable to the earlier acquisition. The writ petition was maintainable because the petitioners were directly affected by refusal of registration and were aggrieved persons. The registering authority could not refuse registration by examining title or insisting on a revenue no-objection certificate where the deed was validly executed and properly presented. Registration was directed, subject to an equitable compensation deposit for affected raiyats or their legal heirs. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2024 16:08:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456625 Land acquired under Section 25A of the Santhal Pargana Rent Regulation Act, 1886 was treated as transferable basauri land, and the 1949 Santhal Parganas tenancy provisions and Section 44A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 did not bar its transfer because the later law was prospective and inapplicable to the earlier acquisition. The writ petition was maintainable because the petitioners were directly affected by refusal of registration and were aggrieved persons. The registering authority could not refuse registration by examining title or insisting on a revenue no-objection certificate where the deed was validly executed and properly presented. Registration was directed, subject to an equitable compensation deposit for affected raiyats or their legal heirs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456625