<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 306 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756602</link>
    <description>The SC reviewed a tax appeal rejected due to limitation under Section 107 of TNGST Act, 2017. Despite a 5-day delay in filing, the court directed the first respondent to consider the appeal on merits, emphasizing procedural technicalities should not obstruct substantive justice. The writ petition was disposed of, instructing reconsideration of the appeal without limitation constraints.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 306 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756602</link>
      <description>The SC reviewed a tax appeal rejected due to limitation under Section 107 of TNGST Act, 2017. Despite a 5-day delay in filing, the court directed the first respondent to consider the appeal on merits, emphasizing procedural technicalities should not obstruct substantive justice. The writ petition was disposed of, instructing reconsideration of the appeal without limitation constraints.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>