<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 301 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756597</link>
    <description>The SC partially allowed the petition challenging GST assessment orders for live honey bee sales. Despite procedural delays, the court found a prima facie merit in the petitioner&#039;s claim of GST exemption under Schedule 1. The court set aside the impugned orders, directing the respondent to pass fresh orders after receiving a Rs. 1,00,000 deposit, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 301 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756597</link>
      <description>The SC partially allowed the petition challenging GST assessment orders for live honey bee sales. Despite procedural delays, the court found a prima facie merit in the petitioner&#039;s claim of GST exemption under Schedule 1. The court set aside the impugned orders, directing the respondent to pass fresh orders after receiving a Rs. 1,00,000 deposit, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>