<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 299 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756595</link>
    <description>HC partially allowed petitioner&#039;s writ petitions challenging tax assessment orders for 2017-18 and 2018-19. Court quashed existing orders, directed petitioner to deposit 25% disputed tax within 30 days, and mandated respondent to issue fresh orders within two months after hearing petitioner&#039;s reply. Writ petitions disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 299 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756595</link>
      <description>HC partially allowed petitioner&#039;s writ petitions challenging tax assessment orders for 2017-18 and 2018-19. Court quashed existing orders, directed petitioner to deposit 25% disputed tax within 30 days, and mandated respondent to issue fresh orders within two months after hearing petitioner&#039;s reply. Writ petitions disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>