https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756592 Under Section 61 of the CGST Act, further action before expiry of the minimum 30-day response period rendered the demand procedurally unfair and contrary to natural justice. The notices and consequential demand were issued in a sequence that curtailed the petitioners' statutory time to reply, so the demand order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh action after granting adequate time to file responses. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Aug 2024 15:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756592 Under Section 61 of the CGST Act, further action before expiry of the minimum 30-day response period rendered the demand procedurally unfair and contrary to natural justice. The notices and consequential demand were issued in a sequence that curtailed the petitioners' statutory time to reply, so the demand order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh action after granting adequate time to file responses. Case-Laws GST Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756592