<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Scrutinizing Tax Search Legality: Proportionality, Privacy, and Statutory Safeguards in Focus; Evidence Admissibility Impacted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80158</link>
    <description>Legality of search u/s 132 scrutinized through Articles 21 and 265 - Doctrine of Proportionality applicable for statutory violations impacting right to privacy. Necessity to examine if search strictly adhered to statutory/constitutional safeguards and resultant impact on admissibility of illegally obtained evidence under Pooran Mal case. Non-communication of reasons for centralization u/s 127 renders transfer void unless assessee acquiesced - Section 292B applicability to be examined. Assessments u/s 153A contingent on seized incriminating material - Sinhgad principles on relevance of seized materials. Individual examination of Section 153C notices mandated instead of generalization. Provisional attachments u/s 281B to be re-examined. Validity of Section 143(2) notices and 143(3) orders open for consideration based on jurisdictional issues. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 07:50:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 07:50:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Scrutinizing Tax Search Legality: Proportionality, Privacy, and Statutory Safeguards in Focus; Evidence Admissibility Impacted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80158</link>
      <description>Legality of search u/s 132 scrutinized through Articles 21 and 265 - Doctrine of Proportionality applicable for statutory violations impacting right to privacy. Necessity to examine if search strictly adhered to statutory/constitutional safeguards and resultant impact on admissibility of illegally obtained evidence under Pooran Mal case. Non-communication of reasons for centralization u/s 127 renders transfer void unless assessee acquiesced - Section 292B applicability to be examined. Assessments u/s 153A contingent on seized incriminating material - Sinhgad principles on relevance of seized materials. Individual examination of Section 153C notices mandated instead of generalization. Provisional attachments u/s 281B to be re-examined. Validity of Section 143(2) notices and 143(3) orders open for consideration based on jurisdictional issues. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 07:50:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>