<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuation excludes 3rd party inspection &amp; transport charges. &quot;By reason of sale&quot; doesn&#039;t negate charging section. Demand without evidence unsustainable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80134</link>
    <description>Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded from price - expression &quot;by reason of sale, or in connection with sale&quot; in definition of transaction value does not negate charging section - demand for duty on third party inspection charges set aside. Demand based solely on statement of Director without corroborative evidence unsustainable - Continental Cement case followed - demand set aside. Penalty on Director unjustified, set aside. Appeals allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 07:49:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 07:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Valuation excludes 3rd party inspection &amp; transport charges. &quot;By reason of sale&quot; doesn&#039;t negate charging section. Demand without evidence unsustainable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80134</link>
      <description>Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded from price - expression &quot;by reason of sale, or in connection with sale&quot; in definition of transaction value does not negate charging section - demand for duty on third party inspection charges set aside. Demand based solely on statement of Director without corroborative evidence unsustainable - Continental Cement case followed - demand set aside. Penalty on Director unjustified, set aside. Appeals allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 07:49:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>