<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1492 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling that the appellant was not liable for service tax on management, maintenance, and repair of roads. The services were classified as works contract service, exempt under Notification No.24/2009-ST and the Finance Act, 2012. The demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appellant was granted consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 21:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1492 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling that the appellant was not liable for service tax on management, maintenance, and repair of roads. The services were classified as works contract service, exempt under Notification No.24/2009-ST and the Finance Act, 2012. The demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appellant was granted consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>