<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 236 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756532</link>
    <description>Writ petitions concerning GST on royalty for mining were disposed of by directing the respondents to keep recovery in abeyance until the Supreme Court decides the issue. The Court did not finally adjudicate the validity of the impugned notices on merits; instead, it preserved the revenue&#039;s right to recover tax if the levy is upheld, and provided that if the Supreme Court rules against the levy, the impugned order will stand quashed from the date of that decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2024 19:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 236 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756532</link>
      <description>Writ petitions concerning GST on royalty for mining were disposed of by directing the respondents to keep recovery in abeyance until the Supreme Court decides the issue. The Court did not finally adjudicate the validity of the impugned notices on merits; instead, it preserved the revenue&#039;s right to recover tax if the levy is upheld, and provided that if the Supreme Court rules against the levy, the impugned order will stand quashed from the date of that decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>