<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee rightly offered 50% rental income from jointly-owned Singapore property. Revised return accepted. No willful concealment. Penalty deleted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80120</link>
    <description>Rental income determination - assessee jointly owns 50% house property in Singapore with wife - offered 100% rental income for AY 2014-15 erroneously, rectified in revised return offering 50% - lower authorities accepted revised return - no specific grievance raised by assessee. Additional ground for 50% rental income assessability not pressed. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted - no willful concealment as revised return filed rectifying errors, income accepted by revenue - penalty levy not justified based on Supreme Court ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 07:05:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 07:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee rightly offered 50% rental income from jointly-owned Singapore property. Revised return accepted. No willful concealment. Penalty deleted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80120</link>
      <description>Rental income determination - assessee jointly owns 50% house property in Singapore with wife - offered 100% rental income for AY 2014-15 erroneously, rectified in revised return offering 50% - lower authorities accepted revised return - no specific grievance raised by assessee. Additional ground for 50% rental income assessability not pressed. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted - no willful concealment as revised return filed rectifying errors, income accepted by revenue - penalty levy not justified based on Supreme Court ruling.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 07:05:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>