<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37742</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the delay in filing a declaration for renewal of registration by a firm should have been condoned, considering the firm as registered. It determined that an appeal lies against the Income Tax Officer&#039;s order refusing to condone the delay under section 246(c) of the Income Tax Act. The court clarified that &#039;status&#039; includes the classification of a firm as registered or unregistered, making it appealable. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and awarding costs of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37742</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the delay in filing a declaration for renewal of registration by a firm should have been condoned, considering the firm as registered. It determined that an appeal lies against the Income Tax Officer&#039;s order refusing to condone the delay under section 246(c) of the Income Tax Act. The court clarified that &#039;status&#039; includes the classification of a firm as registered or unregistered, making it appealable. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and awarding costs of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>