https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756491 Where a grant order had already been affirmed by the statutory tribunal and only payment formalities remained, insisting that the applicant return to the Assistant Commissioner for a fresh grant was unjustified. The Karnataka HC set aside that direction and issued mandamus to formalise the grant. On the applicable charges, the Court held that the governing pre-amendment rules applied, as the record did not show the amendment operating by substitution in the manner claimed by the State. It further noted that an erroneous law report or publication cannot determine the legal position to the detriment of citizens. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Aug 2024 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756491 Where a grant order had already been affirmed by the statutory tribunal and only payment formalities remained, insisting that the applicant return to the Assistant Commissioner for a fresh grant was unjustified. The Karnataka HC set aside that direction and issued mandamus to formalise the grant. On the applicable charges, the Court held that the governing pre-amendment rules applied, as the record did not show the amendment operating by substitution in the manner claimed by the State. It further noted that an erroneous law report or publication cannot determine the legal position to the detriment of citizens. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756491