https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756490 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate where SARFAESI measures, including action under Section 14, were challengeable before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17. Applying the settled principle that an efficacious statutory alternative remedy normally bars a writ petition, and finding no exceptional circumstance to justify bypassing that forum, the High Court declined to entertain the petition. The court noted that the petitioners' objections could be raised before the Tribunal, and dismissed the writ as not maintainable. en-us Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2024 19:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756490 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate where SARFAESI measures, including action under Section 14, were challengeable before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17. Applying the settled principle that an efficacious statutory alternative remedy normally bars a writ petition, and finding no exceptional circumstance to justify bypassing that forum, the High Court declined to entertain the petition. The court noted that the petitioners' objections could be raised before the Tribunal, and dismissed the writ as not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756490