https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756489 A dispute over deduction and non-release of GST and labour welfare cess under a contract was treated as referable to arbitration because the arbitration clause covered disputes between the parties and the Section 11 court was confined to checking the existence of an arbitration agreement and a prima facie arbitral dispute. Objections based on the final bill, waiver, and limitation were not finally decided at the appointment stage; the court noted that Article 137 limitation had not expired on the facts and left any further limitation objection to the arbitral tribunal. The result was that a sole arbitrator could be appointed and the merits would be decided in arbitration. en-us Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Aug 2024 07:03:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756489 A dispute over deduction and non-release of GST and labour welfare cess under a contract was treated as referable to arbitration because the arbitration clause covered disputes between the parties and the Section 11 court was confined to checking the existence of an arbitration agreement and a prima facie arbitral dispute. Objections based on the final bill, waiver, and limitation were not finally decided at the appointment stage; the court noted that Article 137 limitation had not expired on the facts and left any further limitation objection to the arbitral tribunal. The result was that a sole arbitrator could be appointed and the merits would be decided in arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756489