https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456611 Criminal proceedings against an accused under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act were quashed because the allegations and factual position were identical to those of a co-accused whose proceedings had already been quashed by the High Court. The Court noted that the State had not challenged the earlier quashing order, and the material on record showed no factual distinction between the two accused. On that basis, the prior quashing order was treated as governing the appellant's case, and the proceedings against the appellant were rightly quashed. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2024 19:18:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456611 Criminal proceedings against an accused under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act were quashed because the allegations and factual position were identical to those of a co-accused whose proceedings had already been quashed by the High Court. The Court noted that the State had not challenged the earlier quashing order, and the material on record showed no factual distinction between the two accused. On that basis, the prior quashing order was treated as governing the appellant's case, and the proceedings against the appellant were rightly quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456611