<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 58 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37736</link>
    <description>The High Court held that legal charges and underwriting commission/brokerage incurred for issuing redeemable preference shares were capital expenditures, not deductible from business income. The court emphasized the distinction between share capital and loan capital, determining that such expenses were of a capital nature under the Companies Act and relevant case law. The ruling favored the revenue, with no costs awarded. Banerji J. concurred with the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:09:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 58 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37736</link>
      <description>The High Court held that legal charges and underwriting commission/brokerage incurred for issuing redeemable preference shares were capital expenditures, not deductible from business income. The court emphasized the distinction between share capital and loan capital, determining that such expenses were of a capital nature under the Companies Act and relevant case law. The ruling favored the revenue, with no costs awarded. Banerji J. concurred with the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>