<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 184 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756480</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC dismissed petitions challenging reopening of assessments under section 147. The case involved brokerage income shown in firm&#039;s books but actually earned by petitioner company for work performed for a Finnish company. Based on partner&#039;s statement during survey confirming company performed the work, and firm&#039;s claim of bad debts to offset liability, AO had tangible material forming reasonable belief that income escaped assessment. Court held proper person (company) should be taxed for income it earned, and reopening was justified for both firm and company as scrutiny was required to determine correct tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 184 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756480</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC dismissed petitions challenging reopening of assessments under section 147. The case involved brokerage income shown in firm&#039;s books but actually earned by petitioner company for work performed for a Finnish company. Based on partner&#039;s statement during survey confirming company performed the work, and firm&#039;s claim of bad debts to offset liability, AO had tangible material forming reasonable belief that income escaped assessment. Court held proper person (company) should be taxed for income it earned, and reopening was justified for both firm and company as scrutiny was required to determine correct tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>