https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756477 The HC partially allowed the writ petition, emphasizing the necessity of an opportunity for a hearing to uphold natural justice principles. The assessment order remained valid, as the petitioner had chances to respond. However, the revisional order under Section 264 was set aside due to the absence of a hearing, and the matter was remanded for a fresh order with a single hearing opportunity for the petitioner. Failure to utilize this opportunity would preclude further chances. en-us Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Aug 2024 08:10:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756477 The HC partially allowed the writ petition, emphasizing the necessity of an opportunity for a hearing to uphold natural justice principles. The assessment order remained valid, as the petitioner had chances to respond. However, the revisional order under Section 264 was set aside due to the absence of a hearing, and the matter was remanded for a fresh order with a single hearing opportunity for the petitioner. Failure to utilize this opportunity would preclude further chances. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756477