<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 172 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756468</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty, originally levied on an estimated basis for alleged bogus purchases, was deemed unsustainable. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that penalties are not justifiable for additions made on estimation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 172 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756468</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty, originally levied on an estimated basis for alleged bogus purchases, was deemed unsustainable. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that penalties are not justifiable for additions made on estimation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>