<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756461</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that no addition under Section 50C was warranted where assessee sold plot through 2003 agreement receiving Rs. 4,50,000 while remaining Rs. 4,76,000 was paid directly to Noida Authorities by buyer in 2007. Since transaction concluded in 2003 with prevailing circle rate applicable at agreement date, and remaining payment went to authorities rather than assessee, taxable consideration should be determined based on 2003 rates. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2024 08:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756461</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that no addition under Section 50C was warranted where assessee sold plot through 2003 agreement receiving Rs. 4,50,000 while remaining Rs. 4,76,000 was paid directly to Noida Authorities by buyer in 2007. Since transaction concluded in 2003 with prevailing circle rate applicable at agreement date, and remaining payment went to authorities rather than assessee, taxable consideration should be determined based on 2003 rates. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>