<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 160 - IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, PANVEL RAIGAD, AT : PANVEL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756456</link>
    <description>The Sessions Court at Panvel granted anticipatory bail to an applicant in an arecanut smuggling case involving goods worth Rs. 5 crores seized at JNPT. The court noted that the applicant neither filed a bill of entry nor claimed the goods, which were destined for ICD Tughlakabad. Finding the customs action based on probability rather than concrete evidence, and considering the goods were already seized, the court determined custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was granted for Rs. 25,000 with conditions requiring the applicant to cooperate with customs, attend their office on specified Mondays, and appear with legal representation at visible but not audible distance during questioning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2024 08:09:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 160 - IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, PANVEL RAIGAD, AT : PANVEL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756456</link>
      <description>The Sessions Court at Panvel granted anticipatory bail to an applicant in an arecanut smuggling case involving goods worth Rs. 5 crores seized at JNPT. The court noted that the applicant neither filed a bill of entry nor claimed the goods, which were destined for ICD Tughlakabad. Finding the customs action based on probability rather than concrete evidence, and considering the goods were already seized, the court determined custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was granted for Rs. 25,000 with conditions requiring the applicant to cooperate with customs, attend their office on specified Mondays, and appear with legal representation at visible but not audible distance during questioning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>