<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1603 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456595</link>
    <description>The AP HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision favoring a charitable trust against the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The court held that once a trust is registered under Section 12A, the AO cannot probe into its objects unless there&#039;s violation of trust conditions. The trust&#039;s activities of providing workers to users and collecting fees were deemed charitable, not commercial, as they advanced general public utility without profit motive. The court found no violations of Sections 11(2), 11(5), or 13(1)(c) read with 13(2), ruling that advances were not investments and accumulation was for approved charitable purposes. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1603 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456595</link>
      <description>The AP HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision favoring a charitable trust against the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The court held that once a trust is registered under Section 12A, the AO cannot probe into its objects unless there&#039;s violation of trust conditions. The trust&#039;s activities of providing workers to users and collecting fees were deemed charitable, not commercial, as they advanced general public utility without profit motive. The court found no violations of Sections 11(2), 11(5), or 13(1)(c) read with 13(2), ruling that advances were not investments and accumulation was for approved charitable purposes. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>