<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 54 - HIMACHAL PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37723</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of penalty proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Officer under Section 271(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the penalty notice was issued during the assessment proceedings, ensuring the assessee had a reasonable opportunity to be heard as per Section 274. The Court clarified that the penalty imposition began within the same order as the assessment, even though physically issued later. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to overturn the cancellation of the penalty by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was affirmed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 54 - HIMACHAL PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37723</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of penalty proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Officer under Section 271(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the penalty notice was issued during the assessment proceedings, ensuring the assessee had a reasonable opportunity to be heard as per Section 274. The Court clarified that the penalty imposition began within the same order as the assessment, even though physically issued later. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to overturn the cancellation of the penalty by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was affirmed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>