https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456587 Non-maintainability and forfeiture of equitable relief cannot be inferred from a mere misdescription of the petitioner or from conduct not shown to affect the petition at filing; the real owner's presence through an attorney preserved competence. Grave findings of forgery, fraud and misrepresentation require material proof of fabrication and deceit, not suspicion or incomplete inference; those findings were unsustainable. A development authority cannot withhold construction permission under the Town Planning Act unless the restrictive regime has been effectively brought into force by notification; in the absence of an operative notified scheme, refusal was arbitrary and contrary to law. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Aug 2024 11:14:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456587 Non-maintainability and forfeiture of equitable relief cannot be inferred from a mere misdescription of the petitioner or from conduct not shown to affect the petition at filing; the real owner's presence through an attorney preserved competence. Grave findings of forgery, fraud and misrepresentation require material proof of fabrication and deceit, not suspicion or incomplete inference; those findings were unsustainable. A development authority cannot withhold construction permission under the Town Planning Act unless the restrictive regime has been effectively brought into force by notification; in the absence of an operative notified scheme, refusal was arbitrary and contrary to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456587