<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 365 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456586</link>
    <description>The request for additional time to make good the deficit court fees was treated as reasonable, and refusal to grant that extension was held unsustainable in the circumstances. The SC set aside the order declining further time and recognised the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the extension sought for payment of the deficit court fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 11:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 365 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456586</link>
      <description>The request for additional time to make good the deficit court fees was treated as reasonable, and refusal to grant that extension was held unsustainable in the circumstances. The SC set aside the order declining further time and recognised the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the extension sought for payment of the deficit court fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>