<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening of Tax Assessment Overturned Due to Lack of New Evidence and Full Disclosure by Assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80041</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only based on discrepancy noticed from impounded material relevant to the year under consideration. AO during regular assessment verified the same impounded material and issued notice u/s 142(1) for explanation regarding transactions in impounded documents. AO also called for further details regarding impounded material found during survey relevant to the assessment year, explaining total difference in day-wise amount. Hence, during regular assessment, the issue of totaling difference in impounded material was considered. Therefore, it cannot be said that the impugned notice was .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:13:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:13:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening of Tax Assessment Overturned Due to Lack of New Evidence and Full Disclosure by Assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80041</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only based on discrepancy noticed from impounded material relevant to the year under consideration. AO during regular assessment verified the same impounded material and issued notice u/s 142(1) for explanation regarding transactions in impounded documents. AO also called for further details regarding impounded material found during survey relevant to the assessment year, explaining total difference in day-wise amount. Hence, during regular assessment, the issue of totaling difference in impounded material was considered. Therefore, it cannot be said that the impugned notice was .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:13:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>