<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 119 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756415</link>
    <description>The HC of Calcutta condoned a 16-day delay in filing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision favoring the assessee, concluding that the CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unjustified. The Court emphasized compliance with Section 263 directions and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, answering the substantial questions of law against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 119 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756415</link>
      <description>The HC of Calcutta condoned a 16-day delay in filing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision favoring the assessee, concluding that the CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unjustified. The Court emphasized compliance with Section 263 directions and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, answering the substantial questions of law against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>