<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 101 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756397</link>
    <description>An appeal against a liquidator&#039;s decision under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is subject to a 14-day limitation period under Section 42. A delay of 466 days was attributed to financial inability to approach the Tribunal, but that explanation was found unsatisfactory and unsupported by acceptable material. Applying the governing principles on condonation of delay, the Tribunal declined to extend the limitation period, and the appeal remained barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:11:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 101 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756397</link>
      <description>An appeal against a liquidator&#039;s decision under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is subject to a 14-day limitation period under Section 42. A delay of 466 days was attributed to financial inability to approach the Tribunal, but that explanation was found unsatisfactory and unsupported by acceptable material. Applying the governing principles on condonation of delay, the Tribunal declined to extend the limitation period, and the appeal remained barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>