<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 93 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756389</link>
    <description>Internal apportionment of management consultancy expenses, including reverse-charge tax already discharged by the foreign holding company, was treated as a book allocation within the same entity and not consideration for a taxable service. Royalty under licensing agreements executed before intellectual property service entered the tax net was treated as non-taxable on a retrospective basis. Job-work resulting in finished goods was characterised as manufacture, taking it outside business auxiliary service. Reimbursement of foreign bank charges was viewed as a constituent-to-constituent recovery without a genuine service-provider relationship, and the extended limitation period was found inapplicable absent suppression, disclosure having been made in returns and records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 93 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756389</link>
      <description>Internal apportionment of management consultancy expenses, including reverse-charge tax already discharged by the foreign holding company, was treated as a book allocation within the same entity and not consideration for a taxable service. Royalty under licensing agreements executed before intellectual property service entered the tax net was treated as non-taxable on a retrospective basis. Job-work resulting in finished goods was characterised as manufacture, taking it outside business auxiliary service. Reimbursement of foreign bank charges was viewed as a constituent-to-constituent recovery without a genuine service-provider relationship, and the extended limitation period was found inapplicable absent suppression, disclosure having been made in returns and records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>