https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756387 CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled on service classification dispute between security agency services versus commercial training and coaching center services. The case involved an agreement for executing a project under Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana for rural BPL youth placement in Bundelkhand district, Madhya Pradesh. Following precedent from CESTAT Allahabad in ILFS Clusters case, the tribunal held that grant-in-aid received from Government of India is not taxable under commercial coaching or training service category. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed. en-us Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:11:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756387 CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled on service classification dispute between security agency services versus commercial training and coaching center services. The case involved an agreement for executing a project under Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana for rural BPL youth placement in Bundelkhand district, Madhya Pradesh. Following precedent from CESTAT Allahabad in ILFS Clusters case, the tribunal held that grant-in-aid received from Government of India is not taxable under commercial coaching or training service category. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756387