<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 82 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756378</link>
    <description>A writ court may refuse interference where the complaint of denied cross-examination arises from the petitioner&#039;s own failure to produce the third-party witnesses, especially when summons were issued and acknowledgements were recorded. That challenge was rejected here. However, the Court granted limited discretionary relief by quashing the revision assessment orders, remanding the matter for fresh consideration on merits, and directing that the named persons be produced as witnesses in the reassessment. It also allowed further payment in instalments and confined the attachment order to the balance tax due, with disposal to be completed within a fixed time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:11:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 82 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756378</link>
      <description>A writ court may refuse interference where the complaint of denied cross-examination arises from the petitioner&#039;s own failure to produce the third-party witnesses, especially when summons were issued and acknowledgements were recorded. That challenge was rejected here. However, the Court granted limited discretionary relief by quashing the revision assessment orders, remanding the matter for fresh consideration on merits, and directing that the named persons be produced as witnesses in the reassessment. It also allowed further payment in instalments and confined the attachment order to the balance tax due, with disposal to be completed within a fixed time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>