<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2856 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456567</link>
    <description>A statutory tax charge could not be enforced against a bona fide auction purchaser of secured assets sold under SARFAESI on a free-from-encumbrances basis, because the bank&#039;s mortgage and sale certificate took precedence and the department had not crystallised or effectively enforced its dues before the auction. The purchaser was therefore not liable for the defaulting company&#039;s past tax dues, and recovery remained available only against the original debtor or other assets. Under the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, a mere charge not amounting to a mortgage could not be entered or certified in the revenue record against the purchaser, so the mutation and attachment entries were invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 20:46:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2856 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456567</link>
      <description>A statutory tax charge could not be enforced against a bona fide auction purchaser of secured assets sold under SARFAESI on a free-from-encumbrances basis, because the bank&#039;s mortgage and sale certificate took precedence and the department had not crystallised or effectively enforced its dues before the auction. The purchaser was therefore not liable for the defaulting company&#039;s past tax dues, and recovery remained available only against the original debtor or other assets. Under the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, a mere charge not amounting to a mortgage could not be entered or certified in the revenue record against the purchaser, so the mutation and attachment entries were invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>