<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1470 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456579</link>
    <description>A school driver falls within the Industrial Disputes Act definition of &quot;workman&quot; because driving is skilled work, and educational institutions are not excluded as a class apart from teachers. Retrenchment is invalid unless the mandatory Section 25F requirements are met, including service of notice to the appropriate Government or prescribed authority under Section 25F(c) and Rule 76, in addition to notice and compensation. For recognised private school employees, Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act operated as a statutory safeguard requiring prior approval of the Director before termination; absence of that approval rendered the termination illegal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 20:46:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1470 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456579</link>
      <description>A school driver falls within the Industrial Disputes Act definition of &quot;workman&quot; because driving is skilled work, and educational institutions are not excluded as a class apart from teachers. Retrenchment is invalid unless the mandatory Section 25F requirements are met, including service of notice to the appropriate Government or prescribed authority under Section 25F(c) and Rule 76, in addition to notice and compensation. For recognised private school employees, Section 8(2) of the Delhi School Education Act operated as a statutory safeguard requiring prior approval of the Director before termination; absence of that approval rendered the termination illegal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>