https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456580 The SC held that writ petitions are not maintainable against private unaided minority educational institutions by employees challenging termination. While bodies performing public duties may be subject to writ jurisdiction, only decisions with public elements can be judicially reviewed. The court distinguished this case from precedents, noting that CBSE recognition does not create enforceable rights against management committees. Employees must approach CBSE or pursue other legal remedies for contract violations. The HC erred in allowing the writ petition against the private institution's disciplinary action. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Aug 2024 20:46:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456580 The SC held that writ petitions are not maintainable against private unaided minority educational institutions by employees challenging termination. While bodies performing public duties may be subject to writ jurisdiction, only decisions with public elements can be judicially reviewed. The court distinguished this case from precedents, noting that CBSE recognition does not create enforceable rights against management committees. Employees must approach CBSE or pursue other legal remedies for contract violations. The HC erred in allowing the writ petition against the private institution's disciplinary action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456580