<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 357 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456558</link>
    <description>Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure preserves the power of further investigation even after a police report has been filed, and that power is not exhausted by the Magistrate taking cognizance. A Magistrate may, in an appropriate case, direct the investigating officer to conduct further investigation and submit a further report where material witnesses remain unexamined or important documents have not been collected. The investigating agency is not functus officio merely because the charge-sheet has been filed. The Gujarat HC therefore held that the Magistrate was competent to order further investigation after cognizance, and the revision challenging that direction failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 11:46:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 357 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456558</link>
      <description>Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure preserves the power of further investigation even after a police report has been filed, and that power is not exhausted by the Magistrate taking cognizance. A Magistrate may, in an appropriate case, direct the investigating officer to conduct further investigation and submit a further report where material witnesses remain unexamined or important documents have not been collected. The investigating agency is not functus officio merely because the charge-sheet has been filed. The Gujarat HC therefore held that the Magistrate was competent to order further investigation after cognizance, and the revision challenging that direction failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>