<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 35 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37705</link>
    <description>The Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the Wealth-tax Officer had valid reason to believe that wealth had escaped assessment based on the voluntary disclosure made by the assessee. The Court also determined that the income-tax liability disclosed should have been deducted in calculating the net wealth of the appellant, contrary to the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court referred to various High Court decisions to support its interpretation that the tax paid under s. 68 of the Finance Act was indeed income-tax and should be deducted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 35 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37705</link>
      <description>The Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the Wealth-tax Officer had valid reason to believe that wealth had escaped assessment based on the voluntary disclosure made by the assessee. The Court also determined that the income-tax liability disclosed should have been deducted in calculating the net wealth of the appellant, contrary to the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court referred to various High Court decisions to support its interpretation that the tax paid under s. 68 of the Finance Act was indeed income-tax and should be deducted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>