<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 67 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756363</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court noted procedural lapses in physical verification but found no illegality in the cancellation, given the petitioners&#039; reluctance to cooperate with further inspections. The petitioners were denied relief under Article 226, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 67 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756363</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court noted procedural lapses in physical verification but found no illegality in the cancellation, given the petitioners&#039; reluctance to cooperate with further inspections. The petitioners were denied relief under Article 226, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>