<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 65 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756361</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging an appeal dismissal due to incorrect deposit in Electronic Credit Ledger. The court ordered restoration of the appeal for fresh consideration, directed no coercive actions against the petitioner, and instructed unblocking of the petitioner&#039;s bank account. The impugned order was set aside, ensuring procedural fairness in the GST appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 65 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756361</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging an appeal dismissal due to incorrect deposit in Electronic Credit Ledger. The court ordered restoration of the appeal for fresh consideration, directed no coercive actions against the petitioner, and instructed unblocking of the petitioner&#039;s bank account. The impugned order was set aside, ensuring procedural fairness in the GST appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>