<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 58 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756354</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 265-day delay, citing an unsatisfactory explanation for the delay. The Court criticized the petitioner&#039;s habitual late filings and emphasized the need for timely action in meritorious cases. All pending applications were disposed of, reinforcing the importance of procedural diligence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 08:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 58 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756354</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 265-day delay, citing an unsatisfactory explanation for the delay. The Court criticized the petitioner&#039;s habitual late filings and emphasized the need for timely action in meritorious cases. All pending applications were disposed of, reinforcing the importance of procedural diligence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>