<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (11) TMI 51 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37703</link>
    <description>Under the mercantile system, lease rent accrues year by year where the liability arises under a subsisting lease, and payment in one lump sum does not change the timing of accrual. A dispute only about the quantum of rent does not postpone the obligation to pay. On that basis, the assessee could not claim deduction of the entire lump-sum lease-rent payment in the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:36:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (11) TMI 51 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37703</link>
      <description>Under the mercantile system, lease rent accrues year by year where the liability arises under a subsisting lease, and payment in one lump sum does not change the timing of accrual. A dispute only about the quantum of rent does not postpone the obligation to pay. On that basis, the assessee could not claim deduction of the entire lump-sum lease-rent payment in the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>