<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 54 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756350</link>
    <description>HC held the scheme took effect on 01.04.2012, so the transferor company ceased to exist from that date and its tax liabilities merged into the transferee. Consequently, the Revenue should pursue the transferee for assessment and not the non-existent transferor. The impugned assessment orders against the transferor were quashed and the writ petitions allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 54 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756350</link>
      <description>HC held the scheme took effect on 01.04.2012, so the transferor company ceased to exist from that date and its tax liabilities merged into the transferee. Consequently, the Revenue should pursue the transferee for assessment and not the non-existent transferor. The impugned assessment orders against the transferor were quashed and the writ petitions allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>