<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 45 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756341</link>
    <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period were treated as explained business receipts where the assessee&#039;s cash-based , monthly sales pattern and VAT turnover supported the cash nexus, so the addition under section 69A was not sustained. However, in the absence of books of account and any reliable evidence showing a lower margin, estimation of profit at 8% of turnover under section 44AD was held justified and was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 08:32:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 45 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756341</link>
      <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period were treated as explained business receipts where the assessee&#039;s cash-based , monthly sales pattern and VAT turnover supported the cash nexus, so the addition under section 69A was not sustained. However, in the absence of books of account and any reliable evidence showing a lower margin, estimation of profit at 8% of turnover under section 44AD was held justified and was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>