https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756303 CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal regarding interest on delayed refund. The tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim interest on delayed refund from the date of deposit until realization, following the precedent set in Marshall Foundry case. The dispute was considered settled law (res integra) with consistent tribunal decisions supporting this position. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant's claim for interest on the delayed refund for the entire period from deposit to actual realization of the refund amount. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Aug 2024 08:31:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756303 CESTAT Allahabad allowed the appeal regarding interest on delayed refund. The tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim interest on delayed refund from the date of deposit until realization, following the precedent set in Marshall Foundry case. The dispute was considered settled law (res integra) with consistent tribunal decisions supporting this position. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant's claim for interest on the delayed refund for the entire period from deposit to actual realization of the refund amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756303