<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756298</link>
    <description>Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act fixes the enrolment fee payable for admission to the State roll, and delegated rule-making powers cannot increase that statutory ceiling. State Bar Councils cannot make administrative, welfare, building, identity, processing or similar compulsory charges a condition of enrolment where they cumulatively exceed the prescribed amount; verification and enrolment-process charges may be incidental only within that limit. Excessive enrolment-linked exactions create barriers to entering the legal profession, particularly for economically weaker and marginalised graduates, and are inconsistent with substantive equality and the right to practise a profession under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The position operates prospectively, without refunds of earlier collections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 08:30:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756298</link>
      <description>Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act fixes the enrolment fee payable for admission to the State roll, and delegated rule-making powers cannot increase that statutory ceiling. State Bar Councils cannot make administrative, welfare, building, identity, processing or similar compulsory charges a condition of enrolment where they cumulatively exceed the prescribed amount; verification and enrolment-process charges may be incidental only within that limit. Excessive enrolment-linked exactions create barriers to entering the legal profession, particularly for economically weaker and marginalised graduates, and are inconsistent with substantive equality and the right to practise a profession under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The position operates prospectively, without refunds of earlier collections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>