<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (1) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37694</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, prohibiting the respondents from taking recovery proceedings against the retired partner under the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the court clarified that the revenue could proceed against the petitioner for recovery of arrears by invoking Section 25 of the Partnership Act. The court did not award costs due to the peculiar circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:23:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (1) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37694</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, prohibiting the respondents from taking recovery proceedings against the retired partner under the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the court clarified that the revenue could proceed against the petitioner for recovery of arrears by invoking Section 25 of the Partnership Act. The court did not award costs due to the peculiar circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>